Forums » Suggestions

New Ragnarok bomber variant.

«12345678910»
Jan 18, 2015 joylessjoker link
This thread didn't deserve to be resurrected because if this ship was released, everyone would hide their tridents. We don't want that, we want more trident wars!

Note: This is coming from someone who doesn't have a trident yet.
Jan 23, 2015 The Infinity link
serco has the prom and its very OP, it also goes really fast despite its mass and armor. Other factions should have a similar ship like the Hellfire Ragnarok Heavy Bomber. +1
Jan 23, 2015 Death Fluffy link
I think the point of this ship was to have a better platform for launching avalons at hacs, connies and levies. I don't see anything about it that would make it any more dangerous towards class M's than the standard rag. Nor is it some sort of competitor to the prom. The ragnarok is a bomber, and as such should be universally available, albeit sold in limited locations.
Jan 23, 2015 greenwall link
yes fluffy is right!

+1 again for such a fantastic idea (with the recommended tweaks of course)
Jan 24, 2015 cellsafemode link
I recommend that this ship be limited to only core serco and itani systems in their mk3 variant. They're obviously too powerful in that variant as valk x1's consistently are killed by me in it. And I suck, so that means it's crazy good, because the valk x1 is stupid balanced against other ships in a way that makes no sense in any logical interpretation of reality.
Jan 25, 2015 VikingRanger link
What one were to make a new variant 50% larger with three ports and 30k armor. It could have three large, one small and three turrets, two of which would be foreward focused and the third to the rear. It would be able to fly straight enough for bombing runs with avs, but be able to mount offensive attacks against other foreword targets at the same time.
Jan 25, 2015 greenwall link
changing the size of the ship is a good idea ...not sure if has been discussed in this lengthy thread.

I think making it wider is a better idea. In the same way they flattened the X1, presumably they could just stretcth the ragnarok frame to make it wider. The increased exposure could eliminate the absurd idea of making it even slower than the rag3.
Jan 26, 2015 VikingRanger link
Don't you think it would look a little weird if it were just stretched out sideways?
Jan 26, 2015 Savet link
It worked for Oprah.
Jan 26, 2015 VikingRanger link
Lol
Jan 26, 2015 abortretryfail link
Zing!

People other than me have been bumping this thread for 1.5 years now and not once has a dev even chimed in to say a darn thing about it. Are you guys allergic to new ships or something?
Jan 27, 2015 Savet link
You need to use crickets.
Jan 27, 2015 VikingRanger link
Yeah, c'mon devs, chime in. We just want to hear your thoughts, you don't have to like it.
Peeeeeeeaaaaase?
Mar 12, 2015 VikingRanger link
bump
Mar 12, 2015 Darth Nihilus link
I think making a bomber ragnarok would be the most redundant thing to exist in VO if it were ever created...
Mar 12, 2015 Death Fluffy link
You do realize this is meant to be a decent avalon platform?
Mar 12, 2015 Darth Nihilus link
Make it a centaur in that case...and for that matter the tunguska centaur is a GREAT avalon bomber
Mar 12, 2015 abortretryfail link
Make it a totally new ship with a modern model and texture job. I don't care. What's important here is that Vendetta deserves a proper heavy bomber with turrets and enough firepower to scare a Teradon.
Mar 13, 2015 Sieger link
Yes! Great idea: Make it an exclusive ship for the UIT. It would encourage all these UIT we have to use it in Deneb. Wooo! Good idea, Sieger! +1
Mar 13, 2015 Kierky link
*crickets*