Forums » Suggestions
Bump. I am forming a guild with a dual-commander structure and would like an official way to do that. Though I am one out of many players, it is obvious I am not the only one who wishes for more guild structure customization. This is worth the time to work on it. Guilds are the single most important aspect of this game to very many players.
Well GREY didn't work out, but it would still be super awesome to have flexible guild structures for the guilds that aren't formed by emotionally immature people! :P
Whistler, I demand you thread mute TRS for obvious slanderand overall fuckboy-ishness
Slander? I don't think so. I think TRS is speaking the truth, just look at what GREY is now in the guild roster. Also look at yourself in the mirror, emotions spinning out of control already.
ahem:
"does it need to be said, does it need to be said by me, does it need to be said by me now?"
Prove you are capable!
"does it need to be said, does it need to be said by me, does it need to be said by me now?"
Prove you are capable!
Yeah? I don't see any swear words or sexual innuendos in my post. Unless you're talking to galanoth.
You're stupidity is so obscene joker, that it should be considered as bad as a swear word.
"You're stupidity is so obscene joker, that it should be considered as bad as a swear word."
Before insulting somebody's intelligence, please remember to proofread your insult.
Before insulting somebody's intelligence, please remember to proofread your insult.
You're stupidity is so obscene joker, that it should be considered as bad as a swear word.
Apparently that whole free college thing cannot happen soon enough.
As for this suggestion, despite [GREY] looking a lot like the build-up to and conclusion of Rousey's last fight, it's probably still worth adding the additional functionality...sometime way in the future, appropriate to its low priority status.
Apparently that whole free college thing cannot happen soon enough.
As for this suggestion, despite [GREY] looking a lot like the build-up to and conclusion of Rousey's last fight, it's probably still worth adding the additional functionality...sometime way in the future, appropriate to its low priority status.
-1
This is silly. Why more commanders? If your commander can't get in the game, then let the LT's do their work. I'd be in favor of increasing the LT count to 4, that would help in your situations.
A bigger issue is the simple group limit to 8 members! Which if you are in need of more commanders, then I'm certain that has been a much bigger issue for you.
This is silly. Why more commanders? If your commander can't get in the game, then let the LT's do their work. I'd be in favor of increasing the LT count to 4, that would help in your situations.
A bigger issue is the simple group limit to 8 members! Which if you are in need of more commanders, then I'm certain that has been a much bigger issue for you.
Lisa, you aren't looking at this from a true RP perspective.
I can see how a nationalist guild may want a triumvirate of leadership, where 3 people are all equal in rank and of the highest rank.
I can see where a trading guild may want a partnership with 2 leaders.
I can see how an anything goes guild may want a bunch of leaders because "something something boat"
I can see how a nationalist guild may want a triumvirate of leadership, where 3 people are all equal in rank and of the highest rank.
I can see where a trading guild may want a partnership with 2 leaders.
I can see how an anything goes guild may want a bunch of leaders because "something something boat"
This is silly. Why more commanders? If your commander can't get in the game, then let the LT's do their work. I'd be in favor of increasing the LT count to 4, that would help in your situations.
The suggestion is for Guild Software to allow guilds to set any custom structure up they desire to implement. Thus both scenarios are covered and it is a matter for each guild to determine how they want to govern themselves.
If you are suggesting that setting up your guild in that way is stupid then by extension you are calling any guild who would want to stupid. The suggestion is not stupid, the suggestion is about freedom which according you to Americans is definitely not stupid.
The suggestion is for Guild Software to allow guilds to set any custom structure up they desire to implement. Thus both scenarios are covered and it is a matter for each guild to determine how they want to govern themselves.
If you are suggesting that setting up your guild in that way is stupid then by extension you are calling any guild who would want to stupid. The suggestion is not stupid, the suggestion is about freedom which according you to Americans is definitely not stupid.
Nonsense, many americans don't think everyone should have the same freedoms!
Lisa is a gigantic, ugly troll with a hairy wart on her nose.
Chirp!
This is not currently a high priority, and does require some development time. Particularly for testing (which is above and beyond auditing the codebase).