Forums » Suggestions

Faction standing loss for attacking voys

«12
Jul 26, 2013 Dr. Lecter link
Make sure all those Tunguska guys know that Ecka is a back-stabbing cannibal!

Hey, I resemble that remark!
Jul 27, 2013 Pizzasgood link
Yes, I saw you on I AM ARG! the other day!
Jul 30, 2013 coteyr link
I love how everyone says faction standings should be more dynamic/important/usable/something then immediately turns around and "-1" any idea that adjusts how they work. The truth is they are fun to complain about but any "fix" for or against would come with major bitching.
Jul 30, 2013 Dr. Lecter link
Nobody would be complaining if the suggestion was faction standing loss for kills in monitored/guarded sectors. The problem with your stupid idea isn't resistance to fixing the faction system--it's resistance to butchering the unmonitored vs. monitored/guarded system.
Jul 30, 2013 Lord~spidey link
i only like this idea if you get the faction hit if members of the convoy survive if the're in the sector whilst you commit the act.
Jul 30, 2013 TheRedSpy link
Dont be rediculous ryetoc - this is not a faction system fix. The problems with the faction system don't have anything to do with greyspace where 99% of the time faction standing doesnt matter.
Jul 31, 2013 coteyr link
@TheRedSpy - This change would make it matter in grayspce You could not attack a corvus voy if you wanted to keep POS or admire, it hurt would your corvus standings. or a tung voy, it would hurt your tung standings. It would leave you no place to buy things to use to shoot at people. You would need to pick your targets more carefully.

You would instead limit yourself to targeting "good" voys and only when you knew that it wasn't going to wreck your faction so bad that you could never buy a cor vult again.

Attacking voys would then become something you do sometimes, but not all of them, and at times you would have to choose between letting a million credit voy slip past or attacking it and doing the work to rep your standings.

Of course there would need to be some kind of way to fix sub faction standings, but that is a different thread.
Jul 31, 2013 Pizzasgood link
"This change would make it matter in grayspce"

Exactly! And that is why it is stupid. Greyspace is supposed to be consequence-free. That's the whole goddamned point of having Greyspace in the first place!
Jul 31, 2013 coteyr link
So everyone want's the faction system to be more meaningful as long as it retains it's lack of meaning?
Jul 31, 2013 Dr. Lecter link
Yes, that's exactly it. Because all of VO is Greyspace.

Idiot.
Jul 31, 2013 coteyr link
If you attack a tung voy in Serco space which faction do you loose?
Jul 31, 2013 Dr. Lecter link
Currently, none. If the OP suggested that you lose Tung faction, I'd probably support that change. However, there's room for a more nuanced system: maybe Serco won't report attacks on Tung but will report back to their buddies at BioCom.
Aug 02, 2013 coteyr link
That is what I am suggesting. If you attack a Tung voy you loose Tung standing. I think that should be true no matter where you attack the Tung voy. But any change meets resistance so I guess it's not likely to happen, but I personally think it would add a bit of complexity to the standings system and that's a start.
Aug 02, 2013 Dr. Lecter link
I think that should be true no matter where you attack the Tung voy.

Right, which is why you're a mouth-breathing idiot. Other than that, no concerns.