(Yeah, this isn't a game bug, per se...but i don't know where else to put it)

The summarizing of the Deneb Stats is incorrect:

Currently, the summary shows Serco with 42 points and 10 wins, when they actually have 11 points and 2 wins...and the Itani summary shows that they have 12 points and 4 wins, when they actually have 19 points and 6 wins.

Also: please explain the rubric behind the awarding of "points"...possibly even post it on the "Deneb Stats" page...because, as it stands now, without a clear explanation, the point system seems somewhat arbitrary.

So, as the skirms are fought, the math still remains in-congruent:

The "points" and "wins" in the summary do not accurately reflect the "points" and "wins" listed in the "Participants" table.

The question remains: ***How*** are "points" awarded? Where do the mysterious extra points/wins come from?

The summarizing of the Deneb Stats is incorrect:
There are total points and [layer assisted points. Player assisted points are a subset of the total points. The total points include wins by npcs.

The "points" and "wins" in the summary do not accurately reflect the "points" and "wins" listed in the "Participants" table.
This is because sometimes NPC wins don't always show on the list, but they do show on the map.

The question remains: ***How*** are "points" awarded? Where do the mysterious extra points/wins come from?

1 pt for a fighter skirm
3 pts for a small
5 points for a med
8 points for a large
12 points for the border battle.

Mmmmmmmokay...thanks...makes sense, except...

...these "NPC Wins" and/or "NPC Points" should be included as a metric on the stats table along with a break-down of the scoring rubric, such as you posted.

One shouldn't have to hound the forums for two days in hopes of finding out such basic information.

One shouldn't have to hound the forums for two days in hopes of finding out such basic information.

That would be a suggestion