Forums » Off-Topic
https://www.mathsisfun.com/
There you genka, now you won't be so confused!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ga%C3%ABtan_Dugas
Gaëtan Dugas : “I've got gay cancer. I'm going to die and so are you”
There you genka, now you won't be so confused!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ga%C3%ABtan_Dugas
Gaëtan Dugas : “I've got gay cancer. I'm going to die and so are you”
-----------------------------
We're going to need a citation on that from a source that is not a satire/hoax website.
https://www.amazon.com/Dreams-My-Father-Story-Inheritance/dp/1400082773
Read the book yourself and watch the related home videos, anything I link you're going to dismiss & discredit as a "Conspiracy Theory"
Read the book yourself and watch the related home videos, anything I link you're going to dismiss & discredit as a "Conspiracy Theory"
Ok, as an experiment, how about you try and provide a link to whatever DoJ resource you think you've pulled this "math" from. Plz.
http://www.emaso.com/links/ref-articles/ref12e/ref12e.htm (1991-1996)(fill an gaps of inclusion, or data on gender/age/location with the dutch study)
https://www.google.com/search?q=US+population
https://www.google.com/search?q=US+population
The first time the phrase "In God we trust" was added to currency was in 1864; far after the founding of our country. The first time it was added to paper money was in 1957. Hopfully i'll get to live too see when the phrase is removed from our currency. E pluribus unum is a better motto for this Country.
Also, you failed to understand what Deism is, so i'll just post the definition here:
You're confused and arguing a non-issue, I didn't say that that "In god we trust" was on our money since the founding of our country, all I said was that it IS on our money.
That's why there's a comma right before I said it.
You still haven't provided the source for your claims of the founding fathers(There are a lot of them) religious preference.
The reason it happened in the 1800's is because it was restructured during/after the civil war, so in 1776, 1864, 1957, and 2017 we still are following the same moral structures from the roots of the establishment of our nation regardless of if it was stamped on a coin, or pressed on paper.
That's why there's a comma right before I said it.
You still haven't provided the source for your claims of the founding fathers(There are a lot of them) religious preference.
The reason it happened in the 1800's is because it was restructured during/after the civil war, so in 1776, 1864, 1957, and 2017 we still are following the same moral structures from the roots of the establishment of our nation regardless of if it was stamped on a coin, or pressed on paper.
So, uh, the link you've provided is a non-functioning archive of the actual BJS website. As hosted by a website called "Exposing Myths About Sexual Orientation," which no doubt is a very openminded and unbiased source.
No matter, here is the actual study. Which, if you read, covers "..statistics on the incidence of sexual assault, the victims, their offenders, gender, response to these crimes, locality, time of incident, the levels of victim injury, victims' perceptions of offenders' ages, and victim-offender relationships, and other detailed characteristics."
I checked with a quick skim, and a little cmd-f: "other detailed statistics" does not include sexual orientations of either victims or offenders, sorry.
Edit: Sorry, I fucked up my copy-pasting, here is the actual link I meant to post. The original above is the same wierd-ass clone Mi5 originaly posted
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1147
No matter, here is the actual study. Which, if you read, covers "..statistics on the incidence of sexual assault, the victims, their offenders, gender, response to these crimes, locality, time of incident, the levels of victim injury, victims' perceptions of offenders' ages, and victim-offender relationships, and other detailed characteristics."
I checked with a quick skim, and a little cmd-f: "other detailed statistics" does not include sexual orientations of either victims or offenders, sorry.
Edit: Sorry, I fucked up my copy-pasting, here is the actual link I meant to post. The original above is the same wierd-ass clone Mi5 originaly posted
https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1147
Regarding Obama and "being gay", it's not quite as described above.
"Goldyn was one of the first gay people that Obama knew and Obama said the 'strong friendship that developed helped to educate me.'
Goldyn would remember that Obama was not fearful of being associated with him.
Three years later, writes the author, 'Obama wrote somewhat elusively to his first intimate girlfriend that he had thought about and considered gayness but ultimately decided that a same-sex relationship would be less challenging and demanding than developing one with the opposite sex.'"
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4470040/Obama-s-sex-drugs-past-laid-bare-new-biography.html#ixzz4n7J3oMSP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Regarding Obama being a Muslim:
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obamas-dreams-of-my-father/
"Goldyn was one of the first gay people that Obama knew and Obama said the 'strong friendship that developed helped to educate me.'
Goldyn would remember that Obama was not fearful of being associated with him.
Three years later, writes the author, 'Obama wrote somewhat elusively to his first intimate girlfriend that he had thought about and considered gayness but ultimately decided that a same-sex relationship would be less challenging and demanding than developing one with the opposite sex.'"
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4470040/Obama-s-sex-drugs-past-laid-bare-new-biography.html#ixzz4n7J3oMSP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Regarding Obama being a Muslim:
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obamas-dreams-of-my-father/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_deism
Genka that is the same study I posted, use proportionality and do the very simple math yourself so you can find the % per X.
That study is based on the population of the US, which we know the % of which are homosexual.
Barry and his stepfather love Islam, and Indonesian public schools! What's even better is when he was caught being taught at a wahabi school he instantly was transferred to a catholic school. The only thing that would have been more difficult for him back in the day for him as being a "out of the closet" homosexual back then would have been his social activist and community organizer positions.
All that quote shows is that Barry decided to not have sexual relationships with men not because he isn't attracted to them, or that he doesn't fall in line with homosexuals. ONLY because he would have considered it "too-easy" which speaks volumes about the kind of "man" he is.
Perhaps it has something to do with not having a real father figure in his life, just like 77% of current blacks born out of wedlock/without fathers today.
Genka that is the same study I posted, use proportionality and do the very simple math yourself so you can find the % per X.
That study is based on the population of the US, which we know the % of which are homosexual.
Barry and his stepfather love Islam, and Indonesian public schools! What's even better is when he was caught being taught at a wahabi school he instantly was transferred to a catholic school. The only thing that would have been more difficult for him back in the day for him as being a "out of the closet" homosexual back then would have been his social activist and community organizer positions.
All that quote shows is that Barry decided to not have sexual relationships with men not because he isn't attracted to them, or that he doesn't fall in line with homosexuals. ONLY because he would have considered it "too-easy" which speaks volumes about the kind of "man" he is.
Perhaps it has something to do with not having a real father figure in his life, just like 77% of current blacks born out of wedlock/without fathers today.
@Whistler
That link is not about "Dreams of my Father" which Mi5 linked to. It is a completely different book.
What I am asking for, is a source showing that Obama joined a church to cover up being gay and Muslim. And so far, Mi5 has failed to cite these sources. Your source only states that he considered having a same sex relationship. That consideration does not infer homosexuality. We don't know if he acted on it, and even if he did, he clearly had a number of relationships with women. So he'd probably get tossed into the Bi/Pan spectrum instead of homosexual/gay.
But since you linked a Daily Mail "article" i'll in return the favor with a
Buzzfeed post about an interview with Lawrence Goldyn. I'll drop this quote
"Goldyn recalled that when the future president was a student at Occidental, he "talked to me, he hung around with me, he wanted to learn from me. He was clearly not gay. But he thought I was somebody unusual and somebody he had something to learn from."
That link is not about "Dreams of my Father" which Mi5 linked to. It is a completely different book.
What I am asking for, is a source showing that Obama joined a church to cover up being gay and Muslim. And so far, Mi5 has failed to cite these sources. Your source only states that he considered having a same sex relationship. That consideration does not infer homosexuality. We don't know if he acted on it, and even if he did, he clearly had a number of relationships with women. So he'd probably get tossed into the Bi/Pan spectrum instead of homosexual/gay.
But since you linked a Daily Mail "article" i'll in return the favor with a
Buzzfeed post about an interview with Lawrence Goldyn. I'll drop this quote
"Goldyn recalled that when the future president was a student at Occidental, he "talked to me, he hung around with me, he wanted to learn from me. He was clearly not gay. But he thought I was somebody unusual and somebody he had something to learn from."
Mi5:
You referenced the book Dreams of My Father (actual title: Dreams from My Father) at the beginning of a paragraph, went on to make claims (gay, Muslim) in that paragraph, and then began a new paragraph. A reasonable person would infer that you that you were attempting to cite the book as a source for your claims. I responded with specific citations from the book that do not support your claims (plus another book as explained below). You could now cite specific passages in the book, in context, that support your claims. Or you could cite other sources, but that wouldn't be the same argument.
Float:
I would not be bothered if Obama is gay or Muslim. Regarding the "gay" quote, I ought to have pointed out that Dreams actually doesn't have any reference to Goldyn, homosexuality, etc.. The book that does, Rising Star, says what I quoted - which does not make him gay and I wouldn't care if he did have a gay relationship. More importantly, it's not in Dreams and it did not support the argument anyway.
You referenced the book Dreams of My Father (actual title: Dreams from My Father) at the beginning of a paragraph, went on to make claims (gay, Muslim) in that paragraph, and then began a new paragraph. A reasonable person would infer that you that you were attempting to cite the book as a source for your claims. I responded with specific citations from the book that do not support your claims (plus another book as explained below). You could now cite specific passages in the book, in context, that support your claims. Or you could cite other sources, but that wouldn't be the same argument.
Float:
I would not be bothered if Obama is gay or Muslim. Regarding the "gay" quote, I ought to have pointed out that Dreams actually doesn't have any reference to Goldyn, homosexuality, etc.. The book that does, Rising Star, says what I quoted - which does not make him gay and I wouldn't care if he did have a gay relationship. More importantly, it's not in Dreams and it did not support the argument anyway.
You should practice what you preach jj.
What is there for me to practice? I never made any claims to my wealth. You on the other hand brag all of the time that you're a millionaire day trader. About the obscene amounts of money that you make every day.
Furthermore, I never made the claim that I'm a christian. So, whatever the Good Holy Book teaches, does not apply to me.
Here's another famous quote about the orangutan in the white house.
As you may know by now, when you attack him he will punch back 10 times harder. -- Melania Trump
Is that a Judeo-Christian value? Hmmmm.... Let's look into the Good Holy Book and find out! Since you've already read through all of it, you already know, but I'll paste it here anyway for those who didn't read it yet.
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. -- Matthew 5:38-40
Uh oh, looks like hitting back 10x harder is not a Judeo-Christian value. Quite the contrary, in fact. Since you claim that you hold to Judeo-Christian values and that all of the country should, how about your turn your other cheek for us?
If you retract that claim, that would work too. Up to you!
What is there for me to practice? I never made any claims to my wealth. You on the other hand brag all of the time that you're a millionaire day trader. About the obscene amounts of money that you make every day.
Furthermore, I never made the claim that I'm a christian. So, whatever the Good Holy Book teaches, does not apply to me.
Here's another famous quote about the orangutan in the white house.
As you may know by now, when you attack him he will punch back 10 times harder. -- Melania Trump
Is that a Judeo-Christian value? Hmmmm.... Let's look into the Good Holy Book and find out! Since you've already read through all of it, you already know, but I'll paste it here anyway for those who didn't read it yet.
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[a] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. -- Matthew 5:38-40
Uh oh, looks like hitting back 10x harder is not a Judeo-Christian value. Quite the contrary, in fact. Since you claim that you hold to Judeo-Christian values and that all of the country should, how about your turn your other cheek for us?
If you retract that claim, that would work too. Up to you!
Uhh, so what is going on with Net neutrality? Has it been shut down yet, or ain't anything happened yet?
Nothing's happening yet. The talks are still ongoing.
I was happy to tone down the personal attacks, but we're heading back that way again. I may have to thread-mute if people can't limit their attacks to the argument (whatever it is now) rather than the person making it. Consider yourselves warned, so do not expect me to edit for you here.
I won't apologize for my wealth, I never made the claim that I'm a christian either, if you can quote me saying otherwise go ahead.
My suggestion was you research it yourself, it's all public information. The Department of Justice are homophobes now according to genka so it's up to you to validate the information on your own.
What about the other 99 examples?
102.) Gas prices the cheapest they have been in over a decade.
@Whistler
A reasonable person would have read the entire post, I've already posted 100% authentic documents that show Barry practiced "Islam" above, your "counter-argument" consisted of a website that made the excuse based on unsubstantiated proof that it was because of his father and a mistake.
At best the brainwashing he received there was at minimum, but that doesn't excuse the odd things that have been uncovered in his past and his ties to racists, Islamic radicals, and so on.
There have been recent leaks of emails that would suggest he partakes in male prostitutes or "hotdogs" as recently as a few months before his final term was up, and as far back as when he joined the Trinity United Church of Christ.
My suggestion was you research it yourself, it's all public information. The Department of Justice are homophobes now according to genka so it's up to you to validate the information on your own.
What about the other 99 examples?
102.) Gas prices the cheapest they have been in over a decade.
@Whistler
A reasonable person would have read the entire post, I've already posted 100% authentic documents that show Barry practiced "Islam" above, your "counter-argument" consisted of a website that made the excuse based on unsubstantiated proof that it was because of his father and a mistake.
At best the brainwashing he received there was at minimum, but that doesn't excuse the odd things that have been uncovered in his past and his ties to racists, Islamic radicals, and so on.
There have been recent leaks of emails that would suggest he partakes in male prostitutes or "hotdogs" as recently as a few months before his final term was up, and as far back as when he joined the Trinity United Church of Christ.
Wrong, mi5.
Oil price was at its lowest in 2016, while Obama was still president.
https://www.dailyfx.com/crude-oil
Your 102 "examples" are more like 102 reasons to not vote for GOP in 2018 and 2020, lulz. Thanks for confirming my thoughts.
Oil price was at its lowest in 2016, while Obama was still president.
https://www.dailyfx.com/crude-oil
Your 102 "examples" are more like 102 reasons to not vote for GOP in 2018 and 2020, lulz. Thanks for confirming my thoughts.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/27/fourth-of-july-travelers-will-see-cheapest-gas-prices-in-12-years-gasbuddy-says.html
https://www.gasbuddy.com/
I filled up at 1.99 this morning, it's already down .20$ since that was posted and it's only been two weeks. When Trump guts the gas tax, it's going to drop another .4X$ on top of that.
Meanwhile https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/07/16/world/americas/venezuela-shortages.html
Try again.
@Whistler
Watch the home videos from when he was in school.
https://www.gasbuddy.com/
I filled up at 1.99 this morning, it's already down .20$ since that was posted and it's only been two weeks. When Trump guts the gas tax, it's going to drop another .4X$ on top of that.
Meanwhile https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/07/16/world/americas/venezuela-shortages.html
Try again.
@Whistler
Watch the home videos from when he was in school.