Forums » Suggestions

Suggest Not Adding Avalon Safety

Dec 04, 2019 greenwall link
As an FYI, I've actually been considering doing this to Avalons for years, combined with some kind of "arming safety" that would basically require them to be fired from a distance.

-incarnate


Being able to kamikaze and/or otherwise utilize avalons in close proximity is fun. Please don't take this away.
Dec 04, 2019 incarnate link
I'm aware of the tradeoff. Thanks for the feedback.
Dec 04, 2019 look... no hands link
I agree with greenwall on this. It is fun.
Dec 04, 2019 Drevent1 link
+1 to suicide Avalons I like blowing myself up
Dec 05, 2019 IronLord link
+1 restricting the usage of the age old bombing weapon would be a big sad
Dec 05, 2019 incarnate link
Right, I'm sure you all do. But, this was taken out of context from a sidebar comment about another subject, where I was talking about historical plans for a different system that had a more complex defensive mechanic / capability.

This is not something currently slated for development, and even if it was, what I wrote was not the entirety of how all things would be approached.

This is also why I'm reluctant to ever talk about the future, because unless I write a wholly-encompassing 10-page treatise of all the ramifications of all changes, and all potential balance and mitigation factors, then someone is going to freak out and start posting about how terrible some myopic part of something will be.

I know that unguided ramming is fun in VO. I literally invented it. It was not an "accident". Chill out.