For the nationalist and martial Serco: A fight to the death to take the role early and an automatic exit after a month. Say "Garry Dope" a serco NPC starts with the title and everyone else has to /duel for it after. In chat the the title "General"will be in front of their name

For the mercantile and democratic UIT: A popular vote every month will decide who gets it. In chat the the title "President"will be in front of their name

For the honorable and peaceful Itani nation: Another vote but only for members of the millitary (men of good standing) in chat this person who holds this position will have "High Abbot" in front of their name.

I'm open to suggestions for the title of the Serco leader. Since if i remember correctly Serco is ruled by a military triumvirate.

As like all suggestions ever made, they can be critiqued and criticized. Here is my honest and blunt opinion of this: that idea flat out is horrible (not intended to be offensive).

I love this idea, but not the voting aspect. I think dynamic titles should be assigned to those who can maintain a certain level of stats. It could start out with simple titles and/or badges, but could be extended to include material benefits (reduced prices of goods, command abilities in deneb and at border blockades, etc)...

For examples:

Chairman of the Serco Dominion
-Most Itani PvP kills in previous week
-POS Serco standing, zero Itani standing
-Possesion of Trident Type M or Goliath

Trade Superintendent of the Serco Dominion
-Highest cumulative credit accumulation over previous week

etc....

Baxter why not describe why it is horrible? That way the suggestion can be built on.

It looks good but it can be exploited ruining its purpose and making it unfair to other players.

public votes are always exploitable... just look at /vote mute

Krueger....Someones going to take that role, dock in a station, and never duel again.