This forum feels like a black hole at times. I know resources are stretched thin, but the lack of implemented suggestions leaves those who actually make suggestions feeling a bit abandoned. I don't expect this to actually get implemented....it is being posted on the suggestion forum....but it's worth a try.

Tho it is extremely tempting to +1 this, I'd prefer the devs sequestered a good long while to make major strides in the development path they've set forth. Design the game they envision, using good suggestions that inspire them and further that vision as they see fit, rather than feel like they have to "appease the masses" with token updates.

Of course a good idea is a good idea, and for the many suggestions that just scream "OBVIOUS IMPROVEMENT", if they can fold them into their workflow without a major tangent from the big goals, by all means have at them.

/2c

I agree with CD.

Given the number of suggestions in the forum, making just one update a month that isn't a bugfix and isn't mobile-only would probably automatically implement the OP in the majority of months.

Even feedback on ones that aren't going to be implemented and why would be nice.

+1 to CD....

+1 to CD
+2 to ARF ... many ideas should be shot by devs as "Not Feasible", "Against Vision", "gamebreaker", while some could get stamps like "Accepted, Queued", "Adopted, fast lane"

Even a final disposition would be great.

I've been out of it for awhile. I would like to eventually semi-integrate the Suggestions forum with the ticket system (when that's public), so I can just like.. link to the given ticket and people can follow it from there. Or, similarly, say "no" for whatever reason.

There's a lot of great suggestions on here, and I'm going to go back through a whole lot of it in the near future. I actually do that every so often.. and read many months of threads. But it doesn't help with the responses in the moment, which are often lacking from my absence due to travel or.. distraction of some other kind.

This is great. One minor addition to linking the two together:

A) Create defined statuses. Example: Implemented, Under Consideration, Approved, Denied, Etc.
B1) For status indicators which denote approval or under consideration, allow the contribution of funds to increase development priority with the understanding that contributions to non-approved suggestions are a risk to the contributor.
B2) Alternatively, hold funds in escrow and refund contributions when suggestion goes from Under Consideration to Denied.