Forums » Suggestions

Station Status Monitoring

«123
Feb 08, 2010 Dr. Lecter link
Shli, you're hopelessly pathetic. Please, carry on - I need the amusement today.

So, if you really feel the need to try and troll me, at least have the whit of intelligence to call in the Dr.

Awww, thanks Fluffer.
Feb 08, 2010 Maalik link
Gee, I wonder if possibly they could have been a reaction to CHRN's 'excessively mean-spirited' reply to the topic in the first place? Could it be?
Naaaah. Can't possibly be it.


If your confusion over what I said is all you have then you have nothing to support what you say.
Feb 08, 2010 Chaosis link
"The game is more fun when people actually log in and play it."

Truer words have never been said.
Feb 08, 2010 Resistance37 link
Back on topic:

I like the idea of a channel somewhat like 201 and 202, and I also think people without the key should be able to see it as well.

Ex. Channel (#): Conquerable Station Turret (#) is under attack in Latos I-8. (Should we add who is attacking...? Or keep it more secretive?)

So all who would like to defend, or attack can get on down for the long lasting (but fun) battle.
Feb 08, 2010 ShankTank link
No, I think this should only be available to station owners. Having it public would just encourage a lot of independent pilots to just try and ninja the station when it's down.
Feb 08, 2010 Strat link
Aye. I think the notification should only be available to current owners or users. If the attackers want to announce the attack on public chat, they can, as can the defenders. Forcing the info to be public will just enable some random player to come in at the last minte and try to dock without doing any of the work.
Mar 30, 2010 endercp12 link
just a bump and wholeheartedly agree just keyholders
Mar 31, 2010 Inco link
"Conquerable Station Turret"

Maybe it is the time to give it a serious name.
This beta naming should not have left the testing server.
Mar 31, 2010 Chaosis link
No.
May 30, 2010 Capt.Waffles link
Bump! for the OP suggestion, not all this other hoopla
May 30, 2010 Aticephyr link
Inco: take a look at this thread.
May 30, 2010 Chaosis link
Why is this shit back?