Small claims court a little slow today Lecter?

Doc review--regardless of how big, interesting, high-stakes, or high-paying the case--is inherently tedious, Gav. Mocking SMM once in a while helps (not that the Vault 3 lockstep compensation doesn't, but still, one does want a little strife now and again).

Your 'duel conduction heat dissipating system for a spacecraft' would fall apart at the first blast of a rocket, let alone a paint chip. If you covered it with armor, then your armor still gets hot. That's what I'm trying to say here; if you could have effective thermal control, and a solid exterior, at least one mammal might have developed a bit sturdier.

Anyways, that graph is math, not science. Science is consistently rewritten (read: wrong) while math is consistently based on the same principles that have been proven beforehand, since before math was even a word. Even where there are false proofs, they can be reexamined with 100% accuracy.

Miharu wrote: I think #169 was "'nuff zed" on its own. ;)

Aw, but I was having fun re-reading xkcd 6_6