Forums » Suggestions

Gonvernment of the faction and wars

Feb 28, 2008 waynegacy666 link
I think the best ranked user of each faction should manage the infrastructures if the faction. The faction should have its own money, the salary of each user will be paid from that money. If the faction is attacked, the money of the faction decreases, so the users salary decreases too.
Feb 28, 2008 Shadoen link
/me does not approve.
Feb 28, 2008 Dr. Lecter link
/me calls little troll bitch
Feb 28, 2008 toshiro link
How would you determine said 'best user'?
Feb 28, 2008 SuperMegaMynt link
Most defective grammar.
Feb 28, 2008 Pyroman_Ace link
I'm against this idea as well.

There is no way to really determine the hierarchy of any one faction. Many people may be Pillar of Society with any given faction, and then what variable do you use? Profitability rules out the warriors, who dont trade as much, or PK's rules out the traders.
Ultimately there is no balance for this system to work under.
Feb 29, 2008 SuperMegaMynt link
There are three especially large governments. One is primarily military-based. Another is primarily economically based. And a third is for philosophisers who attempt to ultimately understand the nature of balance, such as yourself.
Mar 01, 2008 Surbius link
And we seem to be lacking people like you.

Back to topic-

Ranks? Salaries? That can seem like a good idea but to determine 'who' is the best player for that faction... just seems to undermine some factors of the game. Plus this sounds like EvE but I could be wrong.