Forums » Suggestions
Unalingment, or (Pirate) whichever should be excempt from no fire zone.
I suppose Serco(Pirate) or Itani(Pirate) or even (hey, there is one i know of) UiT(Pirate) would be easier to deal with than unaligning players, maybe because of website *online players* design if nothing else, but it does need to be displayed if you are indeed able to shoot people of your own faction when targetted at least.
That isnt the point of this thread though.
These people should also be ignored inside no fire zones. I dont mean they can shoot people, I mean people should be able to shoot them, I'm -1000 Serco, -1000 UIT, -1000 Itani, but yet if I attack a S./I./U. player at a station, and they shoot back, they get waxed by defence forces. at (Pirate) *own faction killed at least* this rule should be removed, for teh victims.
That isnt the point of this thread though.
These people should also be ignored inside no fire zones. I dont mean they can shoot people, I mean people should be able to shoot them, I'm -1000 Serco, -1000 UIT, -1000 Itani, but yet if I attack a S./I./U. player at a station, and they shoot back, they get waxed by defence forces. at (Pirate) *own faction killed at least* this rule should be removed, for teh victims.
i disagree, the idea behinde the no fire zone is that stations are protected by a poliece force. If you attack somone in a no-fire zone they should have the right to return fire, but just because you are a known pirate doesn't mean that the station should encourage random citezens to attack you. After all the poliece don't want normal people wandering around beating up drug dealers. somone who did that would be guilty of assault even though they were trying to serve justace (vigalantie justice that is).