http://www.lamborghini.com/en/about/company/news/details/

http://www.lamborghini.com/en/models/concepts/veneno/overview/#!slide/1628

http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/03/05/photos-lamborghinis-new-3-9-million-veneno-supercar/

I'm pretty sure the Ariel atom leaves it in the dust.

Not the fastest, but it sure looks sexy.

I realize that the target audience for these sorts of cars are twelve yearolds, and the market is made up of people that like twelve yearolds, but holy shit is this a tacky car.

You could slap a transformers logo on there, and it would still look over-done.

I dislike vehicles with such low ground clearance. What good is going fast or looking sexy if a dead coon in the middle of the road is enough to force you to stop, get out, and drag its rotting corpse out of the way? Not to mention the inability to go up any but the most gently curving of inclines. Forget about speed bumps, curbs, etc.

Besides,

When someone spends $4mil on a car, it won't be practical. It's sheer vanity and boasting their status.

Holy. Shit.

Koopa wants a lambo.

Your status of having more money than brains.

I'd take a Testarossa over that thing any day.

If I want to boast my status and not be a moron, i'd start a philanthropic foundation named after myself. That's what people who want to boast their status do.

Five points to Redspy for missing the point.

If I had $4M to blow and wanted to flaunt my status with a vehicle, I'd build a house-dirigible, paint my logo on the side, and then lurk ominously above various cities all over the world. If I didn't care about status, I'd skip the logo, paint it to blend into the sky, and then lurk ominously above more scenic vistas instead.

Sorta reminds me of some really awful rice bodykits I've seen... :/