If you think I'm "reading into" your posts, you should feel free to point out, with specificity, what I've got wrong and why.

Until you do so, your retorts are hollow, like the space between Alloh's ears. If was dissecting your sorry little posts and reading into your retorts, I'd be arguing with myself. Which might actually pose some sort of a challenge. It's easier by far to argue with you, being as you are lower down on the intelligence and rigorousness food chains.

To your credit, however, I think you may have me beat on smugness. Congratulations.

I find that usually, it matters very little what I write when posting replies to your statements, since you read what you want to read anyway.

As for dissecting, yes, you usually go by "falsum in unum, falsum in omnibus" when you're having (verbal) acid reflux, and niggle away at one detail at another. That is actually a compliment.

I'm not too sure about the intelligence thing, however. You go for taunts like these like a bull goes for the proverbial red rag. I sincerely hope that that is not how you conduct your daily life. If you do, I feel very, very sorry for you.

ahahahahhaha

Ha, speaking of reading what you want to read.

My willingness to use cannon to blast gnats varies in direct proportion to my level of boredom. Not unlike my willingness to engage in conversation with yourself, a relatively tedious and non-responsive lump of decaying flesh with all the mental agility of a mid-level insurance company bureaucrat.

At least Gav manages to say something apposite (by accident, I assume) from time to time; you rarely say anything totally wrong, but you also never really say anything relevant to the topic at hand. It's more or less a constant failure to join issue, as reading over any appreciable number of your posts makes quite clear. If you have some sort of objection to getting into an argument, of course, you had best keep your mouth shut lest you say something desperately in need of support that you are either unable or unwilling to give.

Perhaps a practice of shutting the fuck up could qualify you for the breezy, above-such-petty-details-like-logical reasoning affect you like. Wading in and then furiously casting ever-softer vaguenesses about you most assuredly does not.

No, you shut up, please.

Your actions do not match your words.

A compliment from the Rear Admiral, my life is complete.

Seriously though Tosh, you shouldn't bother arguing with the man until he remembers to refill his prescription. Issues indeed.

I wasn't going to bring that up... a gentleman never tells.

Why rear admiral, though? Of the yellow squadron?

Rear Admiral Douchebag.

Haha I clicked Gavan's link, read your arguing for a little bit, and tried to figure out what political thread that was taking place in.

Then I scrolled up to the top. They should make a sitcom about you two!

lol smittens now that you pointed that out I can't stop laughing.

Gav is correct--it's best to catch me after a bit of scotch. Or now, where I'm working on so little sleep that I've somehow flipped over to being nice to people.

how is it to find an DOCK on the space sattion?

Wrong thread Shank! Here, try this.

I was actually trying to form a post containing a cocktail of known elements that set off Dr. Lecter to slap him back into his senses.

So Lecter is like Mike of Shortpacked?