Forums » Role Playing

-SM- 2

Feb 03, 2004 mastacrasha911 link
The SM has not collapsed, we didn't cause your problems... One member was obscene and you all need to get over it. Point the finger all you want, I'm through listening to all of your fairy tale b/s. Say whatever the hell you want but my actions were not those of an obscene player. If you have a problem with Serotonin than deal with it or get over it already, just because he said a naughty word to you doesn't mean you need to slander the SM. We don't need Pyro's idiot timeline, we don't need anyone elses comments about "how we ruined" NT nation... Frankly I don't care anymore, if NT is dead then it is, it's a game. It was the NT members who LEFT THE NT NATION who destroyed it, not those SM members who stood by it. Seriously people can any of you think before you just start typing what ever rubbish pops into your head?

-01
Feb 03, 2004 toshiro link
offensive language is a point i will not enter upon in this post.
it is incredibly easy to blame others. i don't blame you for the so called "collapse" of the NT. in fact, it's what happens to nations sometimes. as you said, live with it, get over it.
however, since tempers are so high, maybe you should consider cutting a little slack, as should the other involved parties.
and, once more, blaming the ones who left gold for ruining the nation, that is just plain nonsense. the process of deterioration was rather long-winded and took a few months (as i see it) to complete it was not anybody's fault, it was just the normal course of events.
Feb 03, 2004 Jm262 link
"Seriously people can any of you think before you just start typing what ever rubbish pops into your head?" -quoted from mastacrasha911.

Well Obviously from your post you don't.
Feb 03, 2004 UncleDave link
Thats a nice comeback Jm, but if you dont justify it, it just seems like youre boosting your own ego. This is a rant in context of the game, is perfectly coherent if a little emotional, and under no circumstances deserves to be flamed.

I think its all gotten out of hand here, EVERYBODY needs to cool down. To be honest, the gold nation havent been anywhere near dominant since early 3.2, I think its foolish to blame it on any small group of players. The problem with the SM was that one or a few of its members were utter assholes, as a result they were all labelled as such, as is the blame game. Unfortunately there are a few people who seek out enemies ingame and those few ill-behaved SM members gave them the excuse they needed.

Feb 03, 2004 Magus link
With all due respect, this "NT Collapse" myth was started by you and your guild to boost your own reputations as the "Rebuilders of the NT." If you repeat a lie often enough, people start to believe it.

As for the behavior of Serotonin, if he's reflecting a bad image on your guild, maybe it's time that you take action to police him yourself instead of defending him. The only reason the rest of SM was hated was because you would jump to his aid every time he said "STFU."
Feb 03, 2004 SirCamps link
/me rolls his eyes and puts -SM- back on his griefing list. People do leave nations because of people. Lin and AgY left NT over SM. I left Serco over Phoenix. Starfreeze left Itani over me (in 3.2). It happens, just accept it. Coming here and insulting everyone is *NOT* the correct course of action. If you think that Serotonin's actions were out of line, you should discipline him and/or kick him out of the guild. As the public sees it, you defend his actions, and (quite correctly) lumps you in with him. Think about starting some positive PR. No one likes whiners.
Feb 03, 2004 Forum Moderator link
"We don't need Pyro's idiot timeline..."

"The problem with the SM was that one or a few of its members were utter assholes,..."

The above are examples of flaming in progress. Copmments like these breed more comments like these, and the flames continue to rise. DO not post such things here. They are rude and are specifically prohibited on the opening screen of the message board.

"This is a rant in context of the game, is perfectly coherent if a little emotional, and under no circumstances deserves to be flamed."

Except that it was a flame in it's own right. I agree that flaming back is just as bad, possibly worse.

[locked]