because of this:

actually do have issues with themselves or their surrounding (i actually thought a great deal about this, and what i deduced did not make me happy).

I thought that you meant zith this that somebody who acts evilly in game is in fact an evil person"to say it nice". I was trying to counterdict this with my statement about the cop, but befroe I could just plainly say something like thatm I had to incorperate a funding for my line of thought. This funding was my explanation that I gave priorly :D

cheers

You saw put seeds in the ground. What you reap harvest.

------- -=Grammarator 2.0=- -------
You saw put seeds in the ground. What you reap harvest.
----------------------------------

Your actions are like sowing seeds in the ground. You reap what you sow.

:-P ;-)


I believe it can go both ways. Someone conditioned to twitch games is more likely to be a PKer, whether or not they are "bad" people in real life (defining "bad" as those that do not abide by the Golden Rule--do to others what you would have them do to you). Yet a "bad" person could be a fan of RPGs and maybe even be a member of Viper or DS.

It's unscientific to make a judgment on someone's character based on in-game actions, as those actions can support both sides of the argument. Like what Furball did, I would want to meet the person in real life and get to know them before I actually say "so-and-so is a 'bad' person."

hm. no, i don't think so. but that's just what i think.