Now, I've been an alt that you've "trained" and every fight you "trained" me to death.

When Impavid applied to [VPR] over 3 years ago (wow, it's been a long time), you never pretended to suck. You said you were "good at PvP from playing a lot of first-person shooters". Remember? Relatively, I was the noob, not you. You came out of the gate beating me more than I beat you (back then), so there was no need to let you go repair. Back then, we had to duel to fight because we were both UIT and you didn't tank your native standing until after you came out as tumble, so just look at our duel records. Our duels were all from back before you revealed your identity. You can see how I was really taking advantage of you as a poor helpless noob... Nice try, Impavid. Luckily, I'm a bit better than I was back then, so if you applied to [VPR] now, based on the results of our fights nowadays, you'd get the benefit of fighting to 10%.

lol, strat, you think Imp was the only newb you "trained"? You've "trained" me 5 or six times over the last 3 years, always the exact same way!

I'm quite good at playing n00b, you outa know, you were the first guy to fall for it...

Strat sure has become ornery lately.

Nice picture, though.

It's convenient that you've made an argument that no one has any way of proving or disproving, Impavid. If you are saying that you've pretended to be 5 noobs that I've personally trained, you're plain flat-out lying. I honestly haven't trained enough random noobs for you to possibly be 5 of them. When I train new players, I don't repeatedly kill them. If you really pretended to be a noob and then sought me out for training, you'd know that.

ITT strat getting trolled hard

Oh strat, if I played a noob and wanted to be "trained", you were the FIRST person I looked for...

The second was Ecka. He "trains" the same way you do ;)

Prove it. Post logs. I know you don't have logs because it didn't happen, at least not the way you describe it.

Strat sure has become ornery lately.

I've been saying this for months, him and Ole One-Foot-In-The-Grave Ecka, too.

I don't need to, everyone who's ever "trained" with you knows it.

Mmhmmm...

strat is very longterm upset that I used him so badly.

He's out to prove he can't be fooled... ;/

PS My first character's PK:D ratio is better than yours. Imagine how it would look without my travel....

Yeah, the travel really hurts the ratio. But I'm also really, really lazy. Meh.

To hell with stupid ratios and kill counts. It's so unreliable because there's no way to tell who kills who and why. Quit using it as a reason that "[CHRN] is better then [VPR] obviously because our KDR is soooo much higher."

You would be insulting yourselves if you said you killed only VPRs and no traders. It's the goddamn purpose of being a pirate, pretty hard to get a kill when you've got a moth right in front of you huh? RP reasons are arguably what make your ratios higher. You kill us AND traders AND of course good old PvP, we just kill you and do PvP.

In a pilot-specific argument, your whining would be much more relevant. But when talking about guild-aggregate numbers, there's a lot more weight due to such stats.

And last I checked, none of us were pure pirates. "If it flies, it dies" is pretty much our only ROE.

I wouldn't say that Lecter. But yes, each member's ROE is up to themselves.

hurrr objectivity sucks subjectivity is so much better derp

"trained"

"If it flies, it dies"

Discrimination!!!!