Forums » Suggestions

PvP Specialist Award/New Rail Gun

Oct 31, 2010 Surbius link
Related to this thread.

Deep Space Rail Gun
Requirements: PvP Specialist I or 8/-/9/-/- (13/-/13/-/-?)
Damage: 3000
Velocity: 500m/s (480m/s?)
Energy: 150/blast
Delay: 2.0s
No auto-targeting
Ammo: 50mm Xithricite
Capacity: 10 rounds
Grid Usage: 8
Mass: 1750kg
Volume (as cargo): 2cu

Flight Duration: 10s (5km @ 500m/s & 4.8km @ 480m/s)
Port: Large
Price: 25,000c
Bolt Color: Bright Red
Sound: Twice as loud.
Oct 31, 2010 Spedy link
Sounds awesome. But, I'd decrease the grid a bit so that using it in a ragnarok more feasible. Although, getting a high-thrust centaur with 2 of these suckers would be nice.

Seems like it wouldn't be worth actually using at range on anything that isnt actually afk...

Although, if you gave it maybe half a positron's auto-aim it might be useful to prom users trying to gun down valks as they turbo away..
Oct 31, 2010 pirren link
+1 to Op,

-1 to decreasing grid usage, 8 is fair enough.

Maybe make it heavier, because port is large.
Oct 31, 2010 Maalik link
Please let's not tie PvP gear to a grind.
Oct 31, 2010 Surbius link
Earn it, buy it, or craft it.

Achievement/levels: Earned

Inflated/Trade/Black Market Price: Bought

Combined Components: Crafted

EDIT: And I think all items should be available via all 3 methods.
Oct 31, 2010 tarenty link
Nice, +1.
Oct 31, 2010 Maalik link
That doesn't justify making any of the requirements unpleasantly arduous. We want this to game to be about player skill not grinding and levels.

What do you mean by "no-auto targeting"? Given the context it is ambiguous. The rest looks reasonable even if a bit conservative and a large port rail would be nice. Although, personally, I would rather it went only 480 m/s as then I wouldn't feel compelled to install the multiaim plugin for when I wanted to pair these with advanced rails. Bright red is ugly. :P
Nov 01, 2010 Surbius link
'Unpleasantly arduous' is subjective but I think I can understand your point of view in the terms you state. So, perhaps the requirements (if desired at all) could be 8/-/9/-/- .

'No-auto targeting' is actually a typo (my fault). It actually reads as 'no auto-targeting' on current Rail Gun variants and it means (from what I understand) that it does not auto-target like the Neutron Blaster Mk2 or similar energy blaster, instead it has a minuscule auto-target function or none at all.

"Bright red is ugly. :P", as you say. Again, it is subjective. ;P
Nov 01, 2010 ryan reign link
" I think all items should be available via all 3 methods."
+1
Nov 01, 2010 Maalik link
8/-/9/-/- is better aligned with existing weapon requirements.

The targeting on existing rails is actually fairly significant. Their descriptions lies.