Forums » Suggestions

Valkyrie Rune

12»
Jul 28, 2010 tarenty link
Decrease turbo energy to 50/sec, decrease speed to 215m/s. It's rarely used, and I think this might help with that... though it still has a tiny cargo and paper-thin armor.
Jul 28, 2010 Dr. Lecter link
Hahahahaha.
Jul 28, 2010 Aticephyr link
no. give it a large port.
Jul 29, 2010 roguelazer link
No, give it 18 small ports, an infinite-charge battery, and a 800m/s turbo.
Jul 29, 2010 ryan reign link
No take away all the ports, half the thrust, most of the speed 90% of the armor and have it produced by the UIT.
Jul 29, 2010 slime73 link
No, make it a capship!
Jul 29, 2010 pirren link
+1 to OP, though armor is still huge comparing with other fighters.
Jul 29, 2010 Starpwn link
No make it 1 small port 2 powercell slots.
Jul 29, 2010 Dr. Lecter link
Y'all do realize this is only funny because it would be a reversion to the original, right? And if we're doing that, the Prom Mk II needs its 50 drain back.
Jul 29, 2010 tarenty link
What's so funny?

Pirren, armor is not huge compared to other fighters. The Valk Rune has a very large profile, and only 600 armor more than a CorVult, though perhaps not "paper-thin."

Prom MkII with 50/sec drain is fine with me, unless it was increased for a balance reason. Remove a bit of thrust and there you go.
Jul 29, 2010 Dr. Lecter link
They were both nerfed for "a balance reason" -- they're so well balanced now that nobody wants either.
Jul 30, 2010 Aticephyr link
Make the center port a large port and decrease its armor by 500. It will be used then, and I don't believe it would be imbalanced given its low thrust and 220m/s top speed. If you must... give it 200kg extra weight to compensate (though Large port weapons are already heavier, so I don't believe there is a need for a nerf).
Jul 30, 2010 pirren link
tarenty +1
Dr. Lecter +1
Atice -1
Jul 30, 2010 Dr. Lecter link
I actually proposed more or less that same idea for the Rune back in 2006(?), when it was first gutted. Everyone got sand in their collective vag over the idea of an AGT Valk, but I'm still down for an infiniboost megaposi chaser Valk.
Jul 30, 2010 endercp12 link
eh Atice basically, you're making a smurf prom so umm no
Jul 30, 2010 tarenty link
AGT/flare Valk would be a bad thing, I think.
Jul 30, 2010 Dr. Lecter link
Oh, wow, I missed the stunning idiocy that was Atice's actual post. My suggestion was a 1L port, 0S port Rune. 1L/2S is just retarded.

Atice, never go full-retard.
Jul 30, 2010 Aticephyr link
heh. it would be used I say! :p
Jul 30, 2010 Dr. Lecter link
Yeah, retarded and used -- just like your mother.
Jul 30, 2010 endercp12 link
you really set yourself up for that one Atice