Forums » Role Playing

Violation of standing non aggression pact with [ONE]

12»
Sep 27, 2009 Roda Slane link
Violation of standing non aggression pact with [ONE]:

Star Buck and Jaarvix have knowingly and willfully violated the standing non aggression pact agreed to by the commander of [ONE], Keria willennium.

I do not maintain non aggression pacts with guilds that can not be trusted to maintain a treaty, and/or impose meaningful discipline within their ranks.

I now war [ONE].

Let this declaration serve as fair notice.
Sep 27, 2009 FatStrat85 link
Surprised it took this long! Heh. Welcome to the club, [ONE].
Sep 27, 2009 Shadow589 link
Who Cares?
Sep 28, 2009 Pointsman link
I care!
Sep 28, 2009 ryan reign link
And I care that Pointsman cares!
Sep 28, 2009 Whytee link
Why can't we all just.................. get along?

I suggest that Roda joins IPA and thus becomes a pacifist. Easier to make friends that way:)
Sep 28, 2009 blood.thirsty link
What's yer status with BULB?

Can we have a list of which guilds ye are at war with?

And btw what does it mean being at war?

Anyway

Bleed well all : )
Sep 28, 2009 drazed link
Roda you got a guild site (or personal site or whatever) where you list NAP's/KOS's/etc? Would be really helpful to those of us that really care about your feelings :)
Sep 28, 2009 Chaosis link
....Whos this roda guy again?
Sep 28, 2009 maddikp link
/me echo's Shadow589's post.

-Folks Dokaris
Sep 29, 2009 Roda Slane link
It does not surprise me that members of other guild that might wish to justify their own positions would interpret this in a light that makes me the guilty party. I would not care to name names or point fingers anymore than Strat would.

It would also not surprise me that pilots that have no presence in grey would make light of the situation, as they have nothing to fear, and offer nothing to be feared.

Some guilds simply can not be trusted to maintain any coherent internal discipline or adhere to a predictable or respectable set of principles. And thus are not really worth attempting to maintain a treaty with.

I tend to make it public knowledge who I am at war with, and I hold the guilds that have made treaties with me to enforce their own guild's policies and disciplines. If one guild's failure to assert internal discipline is to be used as excuse, then let the success and example of guilds that have honorably maintained treaties be used to counter such weak excuses.
Sep 29, 2009 ladron link
I still don't understand why you think anyone would care whether or not you are at war with them.
Sep 29, 2009 Roda Slane link
You don't have to care. Just stay out of my blaster range and you will be just fine. Perhaps Star Buck and Jaarvix like going boom multiple times in a vain effort to defend a [CLM]. I am ok with that. Pehaps [PA] like to run and hide when I am online. I am ok with that too. I don't care if you care, as long as you learn to stay out of my way.
Sep 29, 2009 Aticephyr link
Ha.
Sep 29, 2009 Shadow589 link
People who play this game have issues
Sep 30, 2009 Kierky link
If your username is Shadow589, then you have issues. Thanks for playing! Fuck off please ;)

Good on yah SB and Jaar Jaar
Sep 30, 2009 Shadow589 link
Lol see what I mean?
Oct 04, 2009 actionjjackson link
Star Buck says your full of it, you even say in your own forum that you killed jaarvix and me several times. think you broke treaty as well! and i would never defend a CLM, ever! its against my religion....
Do believe i learned that shoot at the guy with the most damage tactic from you Roda.
a night of fun and broken hearts and you go political on VO, not just by accusations against ONE, but with all major Guilds that hang out in Sedina.
Your non aggression pact was originally with an older guild, and you have been gone a long time, to be coming back acting like a pirate and talking as you are. kinda interesting that you wouldn't bring this subject up in person.

P.S. rules are subject to change.
Oct 04, 2009 Roda Slane link
a) who the hell are you?

b) aye. I killed star buck and jarvix. after informing them they where in violation of a treaty and they persisted anyway.

c) Let star buck say in these forums that he didn't break the treaty. why are you speaking for star buck?

d) perhaps star buck wasn't defending the CLM. we where getting along just fine until I boomed the CLM, and then he attacked. coincidence? don't care.

e) if a guild can't be trusted to keep a treaty, why even agree to one in the first place? oh well. some guild can be trusted and some can't. they tend to sort themselves out in the end now don't they?

a) who the hell are you again?
Oct 05, 2009 actionjjackson link
i am star buck